<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clogged Tubes &#187; Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cloggedtubes.com/category/tech/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cloggedtubes.com</link>
	<description>Words. by Steve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:10:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>IE Soup</title>
		<link>http://cloggedtubes.com/tech/ie_soup</link>
		<comments>http://cloggedtubes.com/tech/ie_soup#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Holt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intranet webapps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloggedtubes.com/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft released the final version of Internet Explorer 8 this afternoon.  Some of you may start thinking &#8220;Hey! Great! Now we can drop support for IE6!&#8221;  Well, I&#8217;ve got news for you: you can&#8217;t.

Well, not if you&#8217;re developing professionally, anyway.

Sure, there&#8217;s the occasional luddite out there who&#8217;s just afraid of upgrading their computers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft released the final version of <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/internet-explorer/default.aspx" title="Internet Explorer 8: Home Page">Internet Explorer 8</a> this afternoon.  Some of you may start thinking &#8220;Hey! Great! Now we can drop support for IE6!&#8221;  Well, I&#8217;ve got news for you: you can&#8217;t.</p>

<p>Well, not if you&#8217;re developing professionally, anyway.</p>

<p>Sure, there&#8217;s the occasional luddite out there who&#8217;s just afraid of upgrading their computers (hi mom!), but that alone can&#8217;t account for the ~20% of users still using IE6<sup id="fnref:IE6-usage"><a href="#fn:IE6-usage" rel="footnote">1</a></sup>.  You can&#8217;t ignore 20% of your user base.</p>

<p>Who makes up that ~20%? Corporate and government users are tied to IE6 by legacy internal webapps that are incompatible with other browsers—even IE7—and who are locked out of upgrading IE or installing a second browser by their enterprise security policy.</p>

<p>There is some hope, a thin, microscopic, atomicly thin sliver of hope.  Vista ships with IE7 in it&#8217;s baseline distribution<sup id="fnref:IE7"><a href="#fn:IE7" rel="footnote">2</a></sup>.  But, unless those enterprises update those webapps, they&#8217;ll be stuck on good &#8216;ol IE6.</p>

<p>So, if you work at one of theses places, <em>please</em> try to make the case to do the updates necessary to get everyone onto at least IE7.  It&#8217;ll be hard though, MS policy obliges them to support WinXP SP3 (and thusly IE6) with security updates through the year 2014<sup id="fnref:ms-lifecycle"><a href="#fn:ms-lifecycle" rel="footnote">3</a></sup>.</p>

<p>What does this mean for web developers and programmers now that IE8 is out?  We have to support 3 versions of Internet Explorer now.</p>

<p>Is it 2014 yet?</p>

<div class="footnotes">
<hr />
<ol>

<li id="fn:IE6-usage">
<p>Most (free) statistic aggregation services place current usage between 15-25%, roughly equal with FireFox usage.</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://upsdell.com/BrowserNews/stat.htm">http://upsdell.com/BrowserNews/stat.htm</a></li>
<li><a href="http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-ww-daily-20080701-20090320">http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-ww-daily-20080701-20090320</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_explorer.asp">http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_explorer.asp</a></li>
<li><a href="http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2">http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2</a></li>
</ul>

<p>Of course, actual usage varies with the scope and size of your audience.&#160;<a href="#fnref:IE6-usage" rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
</li>

<li id="fn:IE7">
<p>At least IE7 pretends to act like the w3c exists.&#160;<a href="#fnref:IE7" rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
</li>

<li id="fn:ms-lifecycle">
<p>Released in 2008 + 1 year full service pack support + 5 years extended support = 2014 <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/">http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/</a>&#160;<a href="#fnref:ms-lifecycle" rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
</li>

</ol>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cloggedtubes.com/tech/ie_soup/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>But, Hey, RAM is Cheap Now, Right?</title>
		<link>http://cloggedtubes.com/tech/but_hey_ram_is_cheap_now_right</link>
		<comments>http://cloggedtubes.com/tech/but_hey_ram_is_cheap_now_right#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 02:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Holt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inefficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloggedtubes.com/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Top 5 processes, all over 100MB each.  Yikes.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-246" title="lots-o-ram" src="http://cloggedtubes.com/wp-content/uploads/lots-o-ram.png" alt="" width="167" height="337" /></p>

<p>Top 5 processes, all over 100MB each.  Yikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cloggedtubes.com/tech/but_hey_ram_is_cheap_now_right/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile&#8217;s G1&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://cloggedtubes.com/tech/t-mobiles_g1</link>
		<comments>http://cloggedtubes.com/tech/t-mobiles_g1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 03:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Holt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloggedtubes.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not going to try and put down the Android platform, since I haven&#8217;t played with it, and, at least on paper, it actually looks like quite a compelling software platform.

The first iPhone hardware was widely and rightly criticized for it&#8217;s recessed headphone jack

I get that there&#8217;s no desktop sync, it&#8217;s all linked to your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to try and put down the <a href="http://code.google.com/android/what-is-android.html">Android platform</a>, since I haven&#8217;t played with it, and, at least on paper, it actually looks like quite a compelling software platform.</p>

<blockquote class="pull wherein">The first iPhone hardware was widely and rightly criticized for it&#8217;s recessed headphone jack</blockquote>

<p>I get that there&#8217;s no desktop sync, it&#8217;s all linked to your google account and all happens in that ill-defined &#8220;cloud.&#8221;  I&#8217;m not sold, but I get it.</p>

<p>As for the hardware&#8230; only 1GB of memory, but upgradeable with an SD card slot, so whatever &#8211; I&#8217;m not going to argue.</p>

<p>However&#8230;</p>

<p>All I want to ask about the new <a href="http://www.T-MobileG1.com/">G1 Phone</a> is: How do you make an all-in-one communication/media device that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/23/confirmed-t-mobile-g1-has-no-3-5mm-headphone-jack/">doesn&#8217;t have a 3.5mm headphone jack</a>?  Why the need to purchase an extra adapter for what&#8217;s supposed to be an all-in-one device?
<span id="more-100"></span>
Audio output through the USB jack is non-obvious and requires an adapter to use the cheap box-store headphones.</p>

<p>The first iPhone hardware was widely and rightly criticized for it&#8217;s recessed headphone jack &#8211; something that budget headphone designs quickly adapted to &#8212; as making headphone jacks fit the iPhone didn&#8217;t harm their usability in any other device.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m nitpicking, for sure, and something that&#8217;s easily corrected in future hardware revisions, as with the iPhone 3G&#8230; but, considering that music (the phone ships with an Amazon MP3 Store app) and video (YouTube) playback are two of it&#8217;s biggest advertised features,  it seems like a glaring omission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cloggedtubes.com/tech/t-mobiles_g1/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone Considerations</title>
		<link>http://cloggedtubes.com/tech/iphone_considerations</link>
		<comments>http://cloggedtubes.com/tech/iphone_considerations#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 00:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Holt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloggedtubes.com/technology/apple/iphone_considerations</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the iPhone was first announced, I thought to myself &#8220;neat.&#8221;  then went on with my life.  I had an iPod.  I had a cell phone.  Life was good.

However, a couple of months ago my contract with my wireless provider expired, and a few weeks before that, my iPod was pick-pocketed.

Now, my phone still works [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/">iPhone</a> was first announced, I thought to myself &#8220;neat.&#8221;  then went on with my life.  I had an <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipodnano/">iPod</a>.  I had a <a href="http://www.motorola.com/motoinfo/product/details.jsp?globalObjectId=92">cell phone</a>.  Life was good.</p>

<p>However, a couple of months ago my contract with my <a href="http://t-mobile.com/">wireless provider</a> expired, and a few weeks before that, my iPod was pick-pocketed.</p>

<p>Now, my phone still works fine, but I&#8217;m considering upgrading to a smartphone.  I would also like a new iPod.  Suddenly, the iPhone becomes an intriguing option, and the flashy, yet useful (in that &#8220;why-hasn&#8217;t-anyone-else-done-this-yet?&#8221; kind of way), visual voicemail doesn&#8217;t hurt.</p>

<p>But, as we&#8217;ve all heard by now, Apple is preventing anyone from offering an incentive by dropping the price of the iPhone with a new contract.  So, cost is definitely a consideration.</p>

<p>Let&#8217;s look at that cost and compare, shall we?<span id="more-29"></span></p>

<p>The iPhone supposedly comes in 2 flavors: 4GB for $500, and 8GB for $600.  (Rounded.  $499 is the same as $500.  Deal with it.)  Well, a new 4 or 8 GB <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipodnano/">iPod nano</a> is $200 or $250, respectively.  I plan to purchase a new iPod anyway, and I&#8217;m cheap, so let&#8217;s assume I&#8217;m looking at the 4GB versions of each.  So, that brings the comparable cost of the 4GB iPhone from $500 down to $300.</p>

<p>&#8220;But!&#8221; You may shout.  &#8220;Most smartphones have media players on them as well; it&#8217;s unfair to compare them by reducing the cost of the iPhone by the cost of the iPod!&#8221;</p>

<p>This is true; well, the first part anyway.  Any recent &#8220;smartphone&#8221; would be remiss without some form of multimedia capability these days.  I have also played with their media players on other people&#8217;s phones and in store displays.  And from my experience, and please do not get personally offended by this if you happen to like them; they all suck.  Do I know the iPhone&#8217;s will be any better in practice?  Ostensibly not, I have not seen the finished product yet.  However, Apple has at least some small experience designing in this area, and it&#8217;s presumably been part of the iPhone&#8217;s design from the beginning.  Besides, if I don&#8217;t end up with an iPhone, I&#8217;ll be getting a new nano anyway.  We&#8217;re talking about opportunity cost here; so, for me, this is a fair method of comparison.</p>

<p>So, as I was saying, $300, US, to compare to cingul..er&#8230; <a href="http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/welcome/index.jsp">AT&amp;T&#8217;s</a> other smartphones:</p>

<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=BlackBerry+8800&amp;q_sku=sku780093">RIM BlackBerry 8800</a>: $500, $350 w/ 2 yr.  contract, $300 w/ 2 yr.  contract + $50 mail-in rebate.</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=Palm+Treo+750&amp;q_sku=sku620003">Palm Treo 750</a>: $550, $400 w/ 2 yr.  contract, $300 w/ 2 yr.  contract + $100 mail-in rebate.</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=BlackBerry+Pearl&amp;q_sku=sku950151">RIM BlackBerry Pearl</a>: $400, $250 w/ 2 yr.  contract, $200 w/ 2 yr.  contract + $50 mail-in rebate.</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=Samsung+BlackJack&amp;q_sku=sku960048">Samsung BlackJack</a>: $325, $175 w/ 2 yr.  contract, $75 w/ 2 yr.  contract + $100 mail-in rebate.</li>
</ul>

<p>See where this is going?  $300 isn&#8217;t a terrible price for a smartphone in this market, some are even at that point <em>with</em> rebates.</p>

<p>Now, I&#8217;ll need a <a href="http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-plans/individual-cell-phone-plans.jsp">voice plan</a>.  450 minutes isn&#8217;t enough, I barely fit in 600 now.  I can get <a href="http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-plan-details/?q_sku=sku1020013&amp;q_planCategory=cat1370011">900 minutes</a> at $60/mo.</p>

<p>For a <a href="http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-plans/data-cell-phone-plans.jsp">data plan</a>, well..  it&#8217;s possible AT&amp;T might offer something here since it can&#8217;t offer an incentive on the cost of the phone, but let&#8217;s not make plans on <em>pure</em> speculation.  However, since the iPhone is just a smartphone without corporate (blackberry) e-mail capabilities, I think it&#8217;s reasonable to use the &#8220;<a href="http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service//cell-phone-plans/smartphone-connect-plans.jsp">Smartphone Connect</a>&#8221; plans as a reference point: $20/mo for unlimited data.</p>

<p>And we should probably figure on about $10/mo more for miscellaneous services like a messaging bundle or insurance.</p>

<p>To review, that&#8217;s $90/mo: $60/mo for voice (900 mins), plus $20/mo for data, and $10 for miscellaneous services.  Not terrible for a smartphone, and I think it&#8217;s a reasonable estimate given it&#8217;s about what I&#8217;d pay for a BlackBerry on T-Mo.</p>

<p>Of course, the only reason this works out at all is because I&#8217;m planning on buying a new iPod anyway.  Ok, well, that and visual voicemail is sexy.  Just not $200 sexy.  And it all depends on reception, battery life, and call quality too.  It is a phone first, after all&#8230;  and that new <a href="http://www.motorola.com/fullspec/MOTORIZR_Z3_PRODUCT_HOME.html">MOTORIZR</a> doesn&#8217;t look too shabby either&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cloggedtubes.com/tech/iphone_considerations/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
